Robots think everything they make is brilliant. Robots are wrong.
A robot made you a thing. Is the thing any good? Nobody actually checked. So we get a real human to look at it and tell you the truth.
[ a human sighs at a desk ]
The robot marked its own homework: “A+! Great question!”
One real human looks at your thing. They put their name on the answer.
“It sounds clever. But is it clever?”
Your robot wrote some words. They sound very confident. A human who actually knows the subject reads them and circles the wrong bits in red pen.
You receiveRed circles, and one sentence starting “so the problem is…”
“Six fingers. It is always six fingers.”
Robots make videos where hands have too many fingers and a chair turns into a different chair. We watch the whole thing. You did not watch the whole thing.
You receiveEvery weird bit, and the exact second it happens.
“It wrote the bug, then wrote a test saying the bug is fine.”
Your robot marked its own homework and gave itself an A. A human who has been woken at 3am by broken code reads it properly instead.
You receiveEvery scary bit, and how to fix it.
“It is not broken. It is just… boring.”
It looks exactly like everything else the robots make. Someone with real taste will tell you why, out loud, and you will not enjoy it.
You receiveWhy it is boring, and three things that look better.
“Please stop telling me it is a great idea.”
You asked a chatbot. It said “great idea!” It says that to everybody. Our human will say no, and then tell you exactly why.
You receiveA no, the reasons, and the one bit that might work.
Send us the thing your robot made. Words, video, code, a picture. Anything.
We give it to a person who is properly good at that exact thing.
They look at it slowly. People are slow. That is the whole point.
A real answer to “is this good?”, with a name on it. Usually: not yet.
Each one has a number, a job, and no trouble saying no to you.
Reads your words
Reads words for a living. Once told a boss “that word does not mean that.” Out loud. In a meeting.
Breaks your code
Woken at 3am by broken code. Twice. Same night. She trusts nothing now, including this website.
Judges your art
Went to art school. Has excellent taste. Will not be nice about yours.
Kills your ideas
Dave has no degree. Dave has said “do not build that” 41 times. Dave was right 41 times.
Send us one thing. One human looks at it. You get an answer in two days.
Forty things a month. Same person every time, so they learn your stuff and start caring about it.
A human sits with your team. They say “wait, no” out loud, before you ship the bad thing.
Real money. No tokens. No credits. No cheap price that quietly gets big in month four. People cost what people cost.
“They said our robot writing was rude to customers. We got cross. Then we read it again. They were right.”
“Our robot gave the code an A. Priya found a security hole. We use both now.”
“Dave said do not build it. We built it. Dave was right. We pay Dave more now.”
It will just agree. They both learned from the same internet. Two robots agreeing is not a second opinion. It is an echo.
Very. A person takes forty minutes to do what a robot does in four seconds. That slowness is what you are paying for. It means somebody actually read it.
They are allowed to. Mostly they do not, because they have read what robots write. A real person signs every answer, so a real person is on the hook.
That happens a lot, and it is not a refund. You can ask a second person. The second person usually agrees with the first one. Sorry.
Send us one thing for $49 and find out. Judge our answer the same way we judge your robot: read it properly and decide.
Do not adjust your telly. The problem is your robot.
Send us one thing your robot made. A real person will look at it and tell you the truth. You might get grumpy. But you won't ship the bad thing.
[ it rings twice. a human picks up. ]